Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Essay


Expelling Religion?

I have grown up in church my whole life, so apart from school, church in another life for me. I am a Christian, and I am not ashamed.  I went to a private Christian school, across from my church, from second to sixth grade. We prayed, were taught bible verses, and it seemed in my own little world that everyone cared about God, was glad to learn about Him, and be in this type of environment every day. In seventh grade, I attended a private academy and some of the same actions were applied during the school day. Then, when starting eighth grade, my parents wanted me to go to Green Sea Floyds, a public school in South Carolina, for various reasons. That is when I realized how different it was from my sheltered life. That is when realized that people did not care about religion as much as I thought they should.
A couple of years ago, I heard that prayer and even the word God in the pledge of allegiance had been taken out of some public schools across the United States.  For me, this was like getting shocked with an electric fence. The first question that came to my mind was, “Do people even care about religion anymore? And “How could they take God out of schools? People should take advantage of freedom of religion in public schools. They should care about religion and it should not be taken out of any school.
It has been recorded that the first action the pilgrims did when they debarked the Mayflower was fall on their knees to worship God. They set laws that followed the Bible. “Colonial governments passed laws strongly influenced by biblical injunctions…” states Kevin Sweeny who wrote an article about American history. Most of the reason they came to America was for their religious freedom from King George II. Eventually, they formed a government of, for, and by the people, that contained those Godly laws. Christian beliefs are what our nation was built upon, and I believe this is why we are as strong and prosperous as a country as we are today.
Some say a reason religion is being taken out of schools is because it could hurt others feelings or because there are so many different religions in the United States and they do not want to offend anyone religiously, yet educators are still required to teach evolution. That is against my religion, but I am expected to learn it. Right? Are they going to “expel” evolution? Probably not. Michael Lemonick, Noah Isackson and Jeffery Ressner argue that “Evolution should not be taught in school because it is a theory and it can’t be proven”. When asked, my eight grade science teacher told me that she is required to teach evolution. She said, “I’m a Christian, but I have to teach what is in the science book. Of course, I don’t like teaching that section because it’s not right.”
Martha Nussbaum (professor of law) argues that the laws should support religions being allowed in public schools, that they should all (religions) be treated equally. “Religious liberty is very important to people, and it is often distributed unequally,” she says. Well, we have a moment of silence. Doesn’t that count? Not for me. Why can they not call it prayer? I know that time is dedicated for that reason. That is not equal to me. We should not be ashamed to call it prayer, because that is what it is.
In conclusion, I still believe prayer/religion should be in all schools, across the United States. This is where America originated, and now it is being hidden behind the curtain. The loss of religion has effected out students, faculty, and our overall community. Recently, a public school closed to where I live, were reprimanded for having prayer before the football game. This is just a prime example. For the government to pass a law saying it cannot be a part of schools, is taking away a right. It is taking away my right.

Documenary

Documenary

Thursday, October 25, 2012

http://animoto.com/play/WfRXrTBAumrVuTho86MoYwReligion in Public Schools

Article 3


Church and State (an organization) argues that the phrase “In God We Trust” is part of our nation.  It claims that if people don’t want this phrase on their license plate, they can have it removed for a fee.  Church and State develops this claim by first stating that this is our nation’s motto.  Lately, it says that if the government supports this phrase, then as citizens, we should too.  Its purpose is to convince the people of America to deal with the fact that God is a part of our nation and we shouldn’t try to exclude Him in any way.

Church and, State, and State Church and. "Michigan Anti-Bullying Bill Omits Religion Exemption." Church & State 65.1 (2012): 3. History Reference Center. Web. 18 Oct. 2012.

Article 2

Martha Nussbaum argues that the laws should support religions being allowed in public schools, that they should all (the religions) be treated equally.  She claims that people do care about the freedom of religion and that it is often distributed unequally.  Nussbaum develops this claim by first looking back on the history of religion in America and how we have religion in schools today.  Nussbaum tells of current situations that deal with religion in public schools.  Lately, the author analyzes historic court cases from over two hundred years (philosopher times) as to how they did or didn’t support religious activity in schools.  Nussbaum’s purpose is to inform us that not all religions are being treated equally in order to stress the importance of the freedom of religion in public schools.

Nussbaum, Martha C. "Liberty Of Conscience: The Attack On Equal Respect." Journal Of Human Development 8.3 (2007): 337. Advanced Placement Source. Web. 18 Oct. 2012.

Article 1


Michael Lemonick, Noah Isackson and Jeffery Ressner argue that evolution should not be taught in school because it is a theory and it can’t be proven.  They claim people have been going to court because they don’t believe that it should be taught to students.  Lemonick, Isackson and Ressner developed this by first breaking down the laws that say what should and shouldn’t be taught in the classroom.  They used the term “church verses state” for the separation religion and schools.  Lastly, the authors describe how religious and nonreligious educators feel about the problem.  Their purpose is to persuade their audience into not wanting evolution to be taught in order to prove a point that evolution is relevant to teaching students. 


Lemonick, Michael D.Isackson, NoahRessner, Jeffrey. "Stealth Attack On Evolution." Time 165.5 (2005): 53. MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 14 Nov. 2012.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Essential Questions

1. Who does it effect the most?
2. How should religion be treated in public schools?
3. What if there was religion taught in public schools?
4. Should religion be taught in public schools?
5. Why should religion be taught in public schools?

Wordle #2

Wordle: religion in public schools

Has God and prayer been expelled from public schools?


 


What   is happening to religion in public schools? Is there no freedom of religion anymore? Do they even acknowledge the need for religion in schools? The school board, who is pretty much directed by the government, has abolished prayer in public school in some states. Throughout this project, I would like to know the effect this change has made in the students, faculty, and the community today, between 2000- 2012. This brings me to the subject of how some schools are even bleeping out God’s name from the pledge of allegiance. “… One nation under God…” This nation was built upon the faith and belief of God. This is how our country came to be, even though we may not have the same standards; we don’t live like the old days. But change isn't always a good thing. No one should be forced into religion, but giving respect to our nation by saying the pledge should not be a problem for the United States citizens.

Protestant Pharisees. may 31, 2011. Photograph. Compassion International. Pax Deo. Compassion International, 31 May 2011. Web. Sept.-Oct. 2012. .